14.10.2025 15:05 CET
This BLAST Slam IV match between Natus Vincere (Na’Vi) and Aurora Gaming looks set to be a tight, high-stakes best-of-three. The odds and historical data tilt slightly toward Na’Vi, but Aurora has shown the ability to push them—and even upset them. The betting lines suggest value lies in stronger map play, drafting, and momentum swings across three games rather than dominance by one side.
🏅 Form, Odds & Market Insight
In their recent confrontation during the BLAST Slam IV Closed Qualifier, Na’Vi defeated Aurora 2–1. On the betting market, Na’Vi were priced strongly, with odds around 2.58 for Na’Vi vs 1.46 for Aurora in one book’s listing; another line showed Na’Vi 2.40 vs Aurora 1.52. These odds reflect bookmakers favoring Na’Vi, but the spread is not so wide as to rule out a fierce contest. (From various match betting sources)
Aurora’s implied win probability is meaningful, and the betting markets seem to treat them as legitimate contenders, not massive underdogs.
📚 Head-to-Head & Recent History
Aurora and Na’Vi have met several times in recent months, with varying results. In earlier qualifiers (such as the Eastern Europe Closed Qualifier for TI 2025), Aurora secured a 2–1 win over Na’Vi, showing their capability in high-pressure matches.
However, in their most recent encounter in BLAST Slam IV, Na’Vi emerged victorious 2–1. The map scores were: first map to Na’Vi convincingly, second map taken by Aurora, and a decisive third map back to Na’Vi. This tells us both teams are capable of winning maps, and the edge may come from drafting, adaptation, and mental resilience.
📊 Team Strengths, Weaknesses & Strategic Factors
Na’Vi is known for strong mid-game transitions, disciplined team fights, and often solid drafting flexibility. Their cores and supports often perform reliably in extended engagements, which tends to favor them in BO3 settings where adaptation matters.
Aurora, on their side, have shown strengths in surprise picks, aggressive tempo control, and capitalizing on Na’Vi’s mistakes. In matches where they get early leads and snowball through objective control, they tend to press advantages hard. Their weakness often lies in consistency across three maps—if a map turns against them, they have more trouble recovering.
Drafting and hero bans will be crucial. If Aurora can force Na’Vi into uncomfortable picks or deny their comfort heroes, they increase their upset chances. On the other hand, Na’Vi’s broader hero pool gives them flexibility in countering Aurora’s strategies.
🔮 Prediction & Edge Scenarios
Given all the data—the betting odds, recent win, and match history—I lean toward Na’Vi winning this besto of 1 series. I see the contest going the distance, with Aurora likely to take at least one map. The most probable path is: Na’Vi takes the first map, Aurora responds in the second, and Na’Vi closes it out in game three.
Upset potential is real, especially if Aurora nails their game-two draft and momentum. If Aurora win the second map fast, they might carry that confidence into the decider. But Na’Vi’s consistency and adaptability give them the overall edge.
Here’s how I see probabilities distributing:
rand1919

We add tips on regular basis but on somedays theres just no juice. Make sure to check back tomorrow.
rand1919
Leaderboard rank: 0
Points
+24
Correct/incorrect
50/26
Pick %
66%
Become a GOCORE tipster
We are looking for multiple contributors with proven experience in the industry. Let’s connect.
Contact us